Can I Give Someone Money To Let Me Watch Dunkirk
An Aviary picture show
Aviary movies like this one simply exist to piggyback off the popularity of more popular movies and play tricks souvenir-givers into ownership the wrong movie come Christmas. They take a big-budget pic, such equally Christopher Nolan's "Dunkirk", which they know is coming out shortly and churn out a movie with a kind of like plot and a very similar name, merely with horrible acting, atrocious writing etc. for virtually no money at all. It's nothing merely a contemptuous, pseudo-plagiarist con.
Don't scout this joke, watch the real "Dunkirk" instead.
190 out of 193 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Absolutely Terrible. Avert like it'southward a nasty viral infection.
the 'It'southward an Aviary moving picture' says it all. Cheers, Emma.
As she said, the Aviary company bank quite literally on rapidly releasing slapstick movies that piggyback on the big releases. Most large ticket movies have an associated asylum movies. This is no exception.
Non worth anyone's time. Don't assist them brand another one. Don't hire it.
75 out of 76 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Admittedly Unreal
This is one of the worst WW2 movies I have ever seen and I take seen dozens. Totally unreal, the costumes/uniforms on both English and German sides were pathetic, equally was the interim, as was the apparent unlimited armament and tactics. Bizarre is another word to describe it.
Not worth the time or money.
82 out of 82 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Operation Dunkin-Donuts !
Well i'g really glad you came here before viewing this complete & utter piece of rubbish !. I got about 15 min into it & realised 'this is it'. The 'actors' the uniform,machines & general demeanor of people attempting to portray scared & drastic torso of men in a huge push to save as much of the structure & integrity of the British Ground forces ! & send a very lamentable crew of the paras to sure death. 'nuff said,information technology's rubbish !!.
25 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
WAME - Worst awful flick ever
I want to inquire to this movie directors, to give me back 1.v hours of my life spent on this thing. Atrocious at all senses, not worth watching. I can't believe that in 2017, people can' make movies like this. Bad acting's, bad music, bad story, bad deportment, bad fighting's - everything was bad. Specially the worst scene was that on the bridge, with stupid actions & reactions, very slow and icky. This movie tin can be used to torture someone, for real!!!
32 out of 34 constitute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One of the worst movies I have ever watched
If you lot are reading this review and didn't watch this awful movie, DON'T Watch Information technology...
I watched it and information technology wasn't entertained at all. Well, it was a funny picture show with the stupid actors and the -very- poor graphics!
This is non a genuine movie, the original one called "Dunkirk" not "Performance Dunkirk". Here is the original one: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt5013056/
If yous already watched this moving-picture show earlier, yous volition know that I am completely right well-nigh this review...
51 out of 55 plant this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Optimist'southward Review (why be pessimist, right?)
This is a GREAT comedy film.
A great-great-great Comedy picture.
If you want to laugh out loud, watch this.
People try to make comedy films like this one, and don't succeed!! This one manages to do information technology without effort! Swell-Keen one-act moving-picture show.
56 out of 66 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Very boring moving
The championship of this movie was promising a lot, all the same don't spent your time watching the motion picture. The most heady in this movie, is watching the clock in the cabin staying at ten minutes to 2 and see it advancing in time when the people leave the motel. Even the High german officer couldn't speak real German. Low budget with ten actors Disappointing
22 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Rides piggyback on a blockbuster
Warning: Spoilers
Quite frankly, I idea I was going to see "Dunkirk", the new blockbuster ...
As it and so happens, it turned out to be a consummate waste of an hour and a half ... time that I volition never get dorsum.
The CGI is worse than 95% of movies I've seen over the years ... and that'south the best function of this moving picture.
Do yourself a favour ... get watch grass grow ... or pigment dry out.
28 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Unbelievably awful
Warning: Spoilers
I accept spent many years on IMDb, reading reviews of films and checking actors, but this film is so bad that I have gone through the lengthy registration process in gild to express the feelings of rage information technology produced.
I do not expect complete accuracy in a work of fiction, but in lodge to relish a film there must be some semblance of reality in lodge to maintain the necessary "pause of atheism" required of an audition.
Let'south just consider some of the film's major failings:
The uniforms worn past both sides, particularly the British, are what may exist found past wandering around a military surplus store and picking up at random. The Parachute Regiment did not exist in 1940 so red berets and para cap badges are ridiculous. The men wear a mixture of ground forces and para clothing and equipment. Don't get me started on the helmets.
The military vehicles are a mixture of units from unlike countries and different eras, mostly American. A jeep in 1940?
The troops of both sides have no idea of tactical movement or burn control. The Germans utilize enormous numbers of rounds to shoot one Frenchman in the dorsum.
Both sides use a mixture of weapons, some of which were not issued in 1940.
Few of the actors know how to deport or control a weapon properly. The Frenchwoman in detail would not only miss but probably injure herself holding her rifle as she does.
A British officeholder request his men if they want to continue the mission?
Overall, I can but assume that the director felt no demand to consult a armed services adviser.
If we add to this the stilted dialogue, the cartoon German "baddie" and the ability of everyone in 1940 to understand what an algorithm is, you can run across why, despite my all-time efforts I could not watch information technology to the end.
Better never to showtime watching.
91 out of 93 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Don't even carp
Warning: Spoilers
one of the worst and unrealistic war films I've ever seen in my life
Showtime of all they were driving along in an occupied country not a care in the globe pull up and the one in accuse says its just on the other side of this field and they get out and walk...They were in a jeep why not drive across the field that's what they were made for. Side by side 5 armed soldiers on a mission that they have been told could win the war all armed, And they all stick their hands in the air for 1 resistance fighter with a shotgun. The span scene was a joke, After the explosion that knocked everyone downwards the first up were all English, All Germans were stunned for a few seconds more than so what did the English language do not option up guns and impale the enemy they ran and fired as they went.This new breed of manager seem to be happy with anything nowadays forgetting that its got their name on it and information technology will follow them
12 out of 12 plant this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Don't waste the bandwidth
The single worst 'war' movie I have always seen - switched off in less than 20 minutes. No endeavour was taken in authenticity or for that matter story line or product. Pretty much everything covered already by other posts here. Actually should check IMDb in future before paw instead of wasting time and spondoolitz!
75 out of 77 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Monty Python without the Humour
Others accept summarised the monumental plot failings- Krauts driving Shermans, 1940 Pommies with Thompson Guns & 6*6 GMC trucks & Jeeps, everyone waiting around for the Seppos when it took eighteen haemorrhage months for them to grow the spine necessary to accept on Fascism, needing an algorithm! from the Krauts to consummate the Chain-Dwelling radar arrangement that the Poms had perfected years before; but the stupid, Millenial rewriting of history meant I have no idea how this domestic dog ended. Presumably Barack Roosevelt instituted a Renewable Energy Target, and Adolf Bush was stuffed.
The SS had shaving bug, feisty, up front end women ran the world, but what made me finally plow off and delete this garbage was the vicious, amoral sadism that permeates every Millenial practise in so called drama.
Utter, irretrievable crap. We are in a lot of trouble.
10 out of eleven found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One-act of errors
I had to stop and look upward this picture after nigh xxx minutes to see if I was the only one who thought it had a rubbish script, wooden actors, a consummate shambles in costumes for the menstruation and a complete lack of armed forces guidance. It turns out I was not. The soldiers seem to take a democratic organization on deciding what to practise, plain whoever directed this has never been in or about the war machine. The dying scene could take come out of Monthy Python - in fact it was a practiced re-create of Peter Seller's 'dying scene' in The Political party. As an ex-soldier I constitute myself appalled at the lack of bones armed services skills possessed by these 'specialist troops' - and in fact a simple google will confirm the Parachute regiment was formed on 22 June 1940 and Dunkirk took place 26 May – 4 June 1940! Non to mention that the Parachute Regiment cap bluecoat only appeared in 1943! For goodness sake - if you are going to spend the £10,000 it must have cost to produce this rubbish, wait upwardly some basic facts!
49 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Worst movie always
Alert: Spoilers
This is without uncertainty the second worst war film I have ever seen. Why were they dressed as Para when the para's were not notwithstanding formed and why were they in the incorrect helmets. Script just terrible. Nothing to recommend information technology all. I would have been improve to spend the £7 on cider. My advice if y'all want a laugh purchase this picture show.
48 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Really, actually crap motion-picture show
Warning: Spoilers
Extremely poor script, extremely unlikely scenario, "Vot is the Algorithm" features a lot.
Unrealistic representation of the French Resistance.
Simply person who knows Vot the Algorithm is happens to be tall, reasonably skillful looking and female.
Manifestly the whole concept of radar depended on Vot the algorithm was.
The Germans are German the French are cowards and the Brits are plucky.
What a load of crap.
41 out of 44 plant this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Horribly inaccurate
The premise of the film is that a squad of BEF soldiers are sent dorsum into Nazi occupied France instead of evacuating at Dunkirk. This sets the film in 1940. In 1 early scene, the BEF team are riding in a Jeep with a white star on the hood indicating information technology's an American vehicle, besides Jeeps weren't built until 1941. Which is the year subsequently this film takes identify. The villain in the film wears the insignia of a Private in the SS simply is wearing a Naval jacket. This same Nazi besides continuously switches betwixt speaking German language and English to every one, including the Germans under his control. With all that said, the "bundle" they are sent to retrieve is a lady who knows how to brand Radar. The pic is in 1940 recall; Radar was invented in 1933. Did any ane research anything pertaining to this moving picture? The picture show is just bad. A waste material of the $5 I spent at Walmart!
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good-- for a High Schoolhouse Film Grade Project
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is quite skillful for a high school film class project.
It certainly wouldn't exist considered skillful measured against any other standard, but for high school students making a movie for the first time, it is a pretty good attempt.
Uh, I'm not positive it was made by high school students, but from the quality of the writing, the product, photography, and the directing it seems like it near has to be.
I do recollect they must accept subcontracted out the bridge-blowing sequence to heart-schoolers. Not very sharp middle-schoolers at that. Certainly i of the dumbest, most poorly researched and executed sequences of all time.
I've got to say that I don't know for certain that this was a high school production, just I'g thinking how could it take been anything else?????
I felt sorry for the actors. It isn't that the acting was in any way, shape, or form good: Information technology wasn't. In fact, compared to normal professional productions, I would be inclined to call the acting "frightfully bad." But, in comparison to the script writing, directing, etc. in this movie, the acting was downright stupendous.
I'k not sure how much they spent making this movie, but I feel quite certain it wasn't much at all.
I am COMPLETELY certain that they didn't spend nearly, nearly enough. Each painful scene is painfully nursed to get the maximum amount of time possible out of it, whether it warrants it or not (in nearly every case, a definitive "Information technology DOESN'T!" I have a feeling very, very little footage was left on the cutting room floor.
Or maybe it was a "can we make a motion-picture show in one day" project . . . .
If information technology wasn't high schoolers, the "one mean solar day" affair might explain this juvenile, lame alibi for a film.
13 out of 17 constitute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tin't believe i just watched this crap from start to finish
Warning: Spoilers
What tin i say about this film that others have not already said already? Everyone has said information technology is unbelievably bad and that is an accurate description. The reasons i actually watched it from starting time to end is that it tickled me, the continuity errors, the bad interim and the God awful dying. Someone should have taught these actors and extras how to put a little life into their dying skills. Their bad dying fabricated me laugh. Ane more thing before i sign off, and this is more than of some advice for motion-picture show directors, do not accept bodily working clocks in the shot, at that place is a scene in a house in a French boondocks with two British soldiers in a room chatting away, one infinitesimal the clock says i.48pm, the next it says 1.45pm, the side by side you lot can't even run across the hands of the clock , then the side by side minute it's back to 1.48pm. Either the director has managed to manipulate fourth dimension or he/she has seriously messed up continuity wise. My bet is on the latter. My advice is stay away from this moving-picture show unless you are actually into bad acting, bad dying and continuity errors. It is considering of these points stated that i gave this film 2 out of 10 rating because they managed to make me express joy.
eight out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Only Awful
Avert. Worst Ever.
What tin can I say - this is the worst film I have seen since Space Mutiny.
But at least Space Mutiny was something like a motion picture - desperately washed, but information technology was a motion-picture show with a sort off plot..
This 'motion picture' was a bunch of idiots with a camera in a forest and a field in one mean solar day - goose egg Production.
The people in front of the camera (not actors) were all wooden and were but ridiculous. Directing didn't be, Editing was terrible, Sound was awful, and the Script was something a fourteen year quondam dyslexic could have done better.
Honestly, the High Schoolhouse Film we made over forty years agone was better - it had a story line. How the hell practise people brand such stupid idiocy??
half dozen out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Worst Dunkirk Pic E'er- Performance Dunkirk
This picture has cypher to practice with Dunkirk. It is a depression-buget ripoff of the Dunkirk name, and a disgrace to production companies. The acting is amatuerish, as is the management and production values. The story has about as much to do with Dunkirk every bit Antartica has to do with Florida. Worst film of the decade.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Operation: DUNG-KIRK
Filmed in that World War Two Mecca, Indiana, this movie will bulldoze you dorsum to AM radio. It is so bad, it could be right up at that place with Killer Shrews, Plan nine From Outer Infinite and whatever other Cinema nightmare that enters your listen. Stay away and if yous don't, not my mistake.
3 out of iii found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Operation Dunkirk
This is the worst movie I have ever seen. I am not an ex soldier to Dunkirk and not remotely connected to the war. It is the worst acting I accept seen for a long time. Shoot the producer. Shoot everybody that fifty-fifty thought to be role of this movie. Rather pay your movie ticket for a box of matches. In this modern age someone must accept thought better. Who financed this?? I accept a movie nigh a dog that can stand on its hind legs. Please finance me.
10 out of ten institute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Definitely under-rated, deserves at least a 2/10
Warning: Spoilers
OK - I saw this because I was confused most the two Dunkirks.. my bad.. Anyway, I didn't think it deserved a 1.7 (current rating), so I wanted to bump that upwards a little with a vote of 2/10. Other comments here are accurate, regarding historical inaccuracies, poor acting (due east.g. dying scenes). I would add together to that some weak accents. My biggest issues were just actually stupid things by the protagonists. East.g. one dude who just walked outside right in front of the oncoming Germans, knowing that they were in the area and would be coming for him; that would accept been a adept time to sneak out the back surreptitiously. And the band of soldiers who told the Germans that they would not surrender, rather than just either (a) shooting the heck out of those Germans (having the slight element of surprise plus a good vantage bespeak) or (b) running out the back door -- merely no, that would make too much sense; better to tell the Germans that you're non giving upward and then wait for them to shoot at you (and yes -- ane of the good guys gets shot..). And somehow in the end the allied planes up in the air can discern the good guys from the bad guys on the footing and they manage to shoot only the bad guys. (And I'll add the radio communications that are easily intercepted by the enemy, that give away the whole plan..) Information technology's not asking besides much to await a moderately plausible plot...
iii out of 3 plant this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bad, fifty-fifty for a computer game
Warning: Spoilers
The just reason I requite "Performance Dunkirk" whatsoever stars at all is the acting of Michael Wouters as Strasser. He realistically portrays a sadistic Nazi officeholder, every bit and so many within Deutschland'south SS were. Rather than generalize the poor quality of this film, I idea it all-time to tick off some of the many bad items that make it such a dud. The DVD comprehend says this film was "based on truthful events." I suppose that'south a reference to Dunkirk being real. I couldn't find anything else existent about this film. So, here are some wrong or bad items.
First, where are the Brits? This is supposed to be a British operation. The only player who sounds British is Ifan Meredith, a Welshman who plays Lt. Calloway. As far as I can tell, the rest are Americans. Most are unknown actors for which IMDb has so little information in 2017, the year the picture was released. 2nd, this pocket-size grouping of British commandos sounds like a modern solar day bunch of kids mouthing off. No British soldier would accept lipped off the mode some of them exercise hither with the colonel. That may be real today (although I doubt very much that it is in the military), just it certain isn't real for the armed forces culture of Earth State of war 2. At that place'due south a lack of a sense of duty, following orders, and sticking to the job to become the job done hither – all of which deviates from the civilisation of that fourth dimension. In other words, it's not real.
Any movie nigh Dunkirk should at least show scenes of the seacoast rescue. They did manage a couple of historic moving-picture show clips, but that'due south all. The movie was shot entirely in Indiana, USA. Where was the fighting line that this small team had to become through? They rode off on their mission in a jeep with nary a sign of war raging around them. Where were their helmets? An occasional superlative brass might be seen wearing a beret, merely line officers and all enlisted men wore helmets in combat. "Steel pots," every bit they were called, protected one's head and saved many lives and injuries in war. Only a few of the German soldiers in the pursuit grouping had helmets. The WW 2 wardrobe must accept been bare.
And so, there's the weaponry. Most of the Brits and Germans have sub-car guns. In reality, nigh combat troops carried rifles. But NCOs and officers got the Tommy guns. These guys were on a stealth mission which meant they weren't out to seek contact with the Germans. So, they didn't need firepower, or to exist weighed down with tons of ammo. All the scenes showed both sides using the twenty-circular sticks of ammo. However each burst fired nearly 10 rounds. In their battle scenes, each 1 had to burn at to the lowest degree a couple hundred rounds. Yet nosotros never saw a single soldier changing ammo sticks. Nor did nosotros e'er see them conveying that extra baggage.
On pes, the Brits are bunched up virtually of the fourth dimension. Wrong! Existent soldiers would have been spread out so that they couldn't all be killed by a single grenade or machinegun fire. When the Germans pull up outside the building, they stand close together – not spread out on the ground where they wouldn't brand easy targets. The doofus Lt. Calloway (Meredith) confers with his men virtually what to do. Unbelievable! Two Brits with Tommy guns could hands accept mowed downward and taken out most of the Germans standing out in front of them. Then, they sit still and allow the Germans open fire on their location.
When they decide to run for the woods, they go out their radio behind. Duh! These guys are and then impaired they wouldn't have made information technology through boot military camp. Or, maybe they knew that the walkie-talkie wasn't developed still and wouldn't be in the field until late the next year? The Battle of Dunkirk ended in early June 1940. Also, the maximum range for a walkie-talkie was three miles – under ideal weather condition. These guys were many miles away from their command HQ. Then they would have had a radio-phone backpack.
When they blow the span and everyone hits the ground, the 2 Brits who rescue the others merely shoot a couple of the Germans and and so they all run off, with the Germans recovering and shooting after them. In existent life, they would have shot all of the Germans so there would exist no pursuit from them.
Fortunately, they didn't prove likewise much by way of regular gainsay. 1 or 2 scenes had tanks, but I doubt they were accurate German language Panzer IIs with 20 mm guns. At least they resembled the smaller armored vehicles of that flow of the state of war. The big German tiger Panzers with 75 mm guns didn't come up on line until well after Dunkirk.
Finally, the RAF fighters that come up to the rescue at the airfield are all done by CGI – and information technology's laughable. One scene shows a Spitfire heading toward the basis and then doing a sudden 120-caste plough to fly parallel to the basis. No plane in history could ever brand such a turn in a distance of a couple hundred yards. Three or iv scenes accept planes virtually on top of the Germans on the ground, and pulling out again in fast, sharp turns. The CGI is and so unreal every bit to be comical.
Most of the acting was sub-par; simply information technology may non be off-white to arraign the actors when the script is and then bad. This whole movie, from first to finish, reminds one of a video game. When I donate this DVD to Goodwill, I may put a note on it to warn prospective viewers. This is more similar a comic book story than a film that resembles realty.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Source: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6836772/reviews
Posted by: dillopith1974.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Can I Give Someone Money To Let Me Watch Dunkirk"
Post a Comment